Isn't it about time that our MPs started to distance itself from this violent organisation, which is thought by some to be a front for revolutionary socialists? In particular, why is David Cameron, who may be our next Prime Minister, still condoning violent action by being signed up to this organisation?
Our politicians condone violence with the UAF
Sunday, 21 March 2010
One of the leaders of Unite Against Fascism, Weyman Bennett, has been charged with conspiracy to organise violent disorder after protests in Bolton. This does at least reassure that the Police are still even-handed after their arrest of English Defence League leaders a few weeks ago.
Isn't it about time that our MPs started to distance itself from this violent organisation, which is thought by some to be a front for revolutionary socialists? In particular, why is David Cameron, who may be our next Prime Minister, still condoning violent action by being signed up to this organisation?
Isn't it about time that our MPs started to distance itself from this violent organisation, which is thought by some to be a front for revolutionary socialists? In particular, why is David Cameron, who may be our next Prime Minister, still condoning violent action by being signed up to this organisation?


Comments
One response to “Our politicians condone violence with the UAF”
Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment |
I know about a UAF chap who was arrested in Nottingham for assualting a copper when the EDF were in town. He appeared in the Magistrates Court and the court clerk was so biased in favour of the UAFs activities he most likely influenced the Bench because after being found guilty of what should be thought of as a serious charge he was given a conditional discharge and was not expected to any costs. It appears that the UAF do have friends in high places.
21 March 2010 17:19Post a Comment