Showing posts with label government spending. Show all posts
Showing posts with label government spending. Show all posts

An Open Letter to Alistair Darling

Thursday, 30 July 2009


We are in a bit of an economic hole.
(Oh and for the record it started in America)
We are all aware of the huge sums of money used to bail out banks.
We currently have a £30 Billion odd taxation hole due to failing businesses, redundancies etc.
We have the worst record and level of government borrowing in our entire political and fiscal history.

So I sat down a few months ago and came up with this little gem.
My friend Subrosa posted it at my request, and now I feel it indeed needs a further airing.


Dear Mr. Darling,

Please find below my suggestion for fixing Britain's economy.

Instead of giving billions of pounds to banks that will squander the money on
lavish parties and unearned bonuses, use the following plan.

You can call it the Patriotic Retirement Plan:

There are about 20 million people over 50 in the work force. - Pay
them £1 million apiece severance for early retirement with the
following stipulations:

1) They MUST retire. Twenty million job openings - Unemployment fixed.

2) They MUST buy a new British CAR. Twenty million cars ordered -Car Industry fixed.

3) They MUST either buy a house or pay off their mortgage - Housing Crisis fixed.

4) They must send their kids to school / college /university - Crime rate fixed.

5) Buy £50 of alcohol / tobacco a week there's your money back in duty/tax etc.

It can't get any easier than that!

Run it past big Mandleson, ooops I mean Gordon. He has a keen eye for fiscal policy.

Lots of Love
TLOTF

Share/Save/Bookmark

Where There's Smoke...

Thursday, 2 July 2009

I am someone who is pretty good with numbers, I have to be for my job, but when the conversation or the public debate turns to macro economics and spending plans I am afraid I get a blurry eyed and a little left behind. I do try, but I have accepted that I will not pick all of the salient details up on the first pass, and it is best for me to sit down and slowly absorb pertinent information by reviewing it in print and the re-reviewing several times.

As such there are two invaluable bloggers who help explain what the treasury is talking about and what the hidden messages might be, they are John Redwood and Fraser Nelson.

Fraser has been following the budget numbers for a while now, and the future spending plans announced by the Government, and he has published his own analysis as a chart which he claims to never tire of putting up… so I hope he won’t mind if we share it here…




The chart shows is based on the projected numbers in this year’s budget and more importantly the numbers spelled out by Gordon Brown in the House of Commons during Prime Ministers Questions. It clearly shows that if you allow for inflation, debt interest and dole the Government is projecting a 7% cut in Government Spending.

Hang on a minute I hear you cry, that nice Mr Brown is clunking his fists against the desk and saying that investment will go up and it is the Tories that will be cutting spending. Except of course Gordon Brown is lying, and by reasonable extension that makes him a liar.

This whole situation is potentially about to get more interesting as it would seem that the newsrooms have taken note of Frasers blog and got the bean counters on it and general consensus is that Mr Browns pants are indeed ablaze; and they are ready to call him on it. So, don’t expect Mr Brown to be viewed for the next couple of weeks anywhere except the BBC. Brown has now enlisted Lord Mandleson and like Mr Wolf in Pulp Fiction, he is there to clean up a dirty mess that was completely unnecessary.

Gordon Brown is convinced his best line of attack leading into the next election is to bet the house on the dividing line being about Tory Cuts vs Labour Investment. But Brown has scored an own goal there because the Treasury has already put out numbers (see chart above) that show this is not the case, so Mandelson is now spinning that the numbers are not firm so that come the pre-budget they can be revised to paint the picture the PM wants them to paint in the final straight.

The main point is that not only has Gordon Brown been caught out by Fraser Nelson, but he has charged Peter Mandelson with spinning it back so that he can cook the books [more so] and set out the Labour election campaign on a lie. We all know about the proverbial house that is built on sand and what happens to it.

It is outright duplicity.

A second point is that for years Brown has bamboozled opponents over many years by throwing big numbers in grand statements. When these numbers are checked there is always a lot of fine print and room for manoeuvre; by the time the details is tracked down and highlighted the story, or the issue has moved. Here, we have the PM and the Treasury releasing numbers that have been crunched and are now available to be thrown back in Mr Browns face; it is a testament to how disorganised Labour has become and how adept people like Fraser have become at rooting out their dishonesty.

Mr Brown insists he has never lied, but the facts and the numbers tell an entirely different story.


Share/Save/Bookmark

What is the purpose of government spending?

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

Paul Waugh has a post that will interest many here in his Evening Standard blog. I have little to add to the substance of his post, except my thought that politicians and journalists should grow up.

However a comment in James Forsyth’s post on the matter in the Coffee House struck me as a place where the the libertarian right should be trying to change the terms of the debate. In discussing health and education budget cuts through efficiency savings he said “…no major politician is prepared to risk the inevitable charge of wanting to shut down hospitals, sack nurses etc”.

The health service’s purpose is not to employ nurses and run hospitals. The health service’s purpose is to treat and care for patients. To do so it employs nurses and doctors, it runs hospitals. Likewise the education department is there to teach children, for which purpose it employs teachers and runs schools.

The left has managed to change the world around. Trades unions representing public-sector workers complain about redundancies regardless of the effect on services and efficiency. The RMT is currently assuming that the London Underground is run on behalf of Transport for London for the benefit of the RMT members. It is not, it is for the benefit of the travelling public.

This is at the core of left-wing state inefficiency. Unfortunately we have had 12 years of a government that is left wing (despite all denials). The government has forced this onto private enterprise, with private companies being run for the benefit of employees above the owners and customers. The way smoking was banned even in private clubs, explicitly to avoid smoke in the workplace, showed the sense of workers’ entitlement felt by the left.

Can we start to take back the terms of debate? Talk about patients and children not nurses and teachers? To answer my original question, surely the purpose of government spending is to run services for the public, not to create employment.

Finally I would like to thank Lord Elvis for kindly allowing me the privilege of posting here.


Update: teachers appear to be unsackable. That is because education is being run for their benefit, not that of pupils.


Share/Save/Bookmark