Showing posts with label acpo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label acpo. Show all posts

The Coming Of Shadows

Tuesday, 27 October 2009

Mrs Elvis is not particularly interested in politics, and who could blame her? She has me to live with after all.

But a very peculiar thing happened in the Paisley household last evening. Whilst watching the enthralling Murderland, we were, once again, subjected to the overly political scaremongering advert for Act On CO2. You know the one, where the puppy drowns? Yes, that one.

Now I've occasionally spoken out on these things much to Mrs Elvis's bemusement, who is the sort of person that tries to see the good in everyone. Her nature is such that if her own worst enemy came begging at the door, she wouldn't turn them away, but would offer them any and all assistance she could. She is the original good samaritan.

So it came as a great surprise to me last night that Mrs Elvis turned to me in disgust after the advert had reached it's conclusion and commented that there is something deeply wrong in our country and the way we are being brow-beaten by the forces that be. The penny is finally starting to drop. And if Mrs Elvis is now becoming aware of the coming darkness, then there is no doubt in my mind that we really are in trouble.

You only have to look at today's Telegraph to get an idea of just how bad things are going to get if we continue on our current path. We have the ISA expanding on it's original mission statement to sow real seeds of doubt and mistrust in the minds of anyone who has not been 'vetted' to see if they're safe to work with children. And Lord Stern is calling on people to eat less meat to help with climate con change. In the Mail we find that there has been a large increase in the number of middle-aged people being criminalised for petty offences, whilst in the same paper we read of a leading Labout think-tank who airbrushed links between immigration and crime in a PIU report issued in 2001. I could go on...

On top of that we have the Lisbon Treaty and the probable ascendency of Tony Blair to the role of EU President. Need I say more?

With each remaining day of this morally bankrupt and treacherous government, we fall further and further into the darkness. It has now become increasingly clear that the 'agents of change' amongst us have ramped up their operations to do as much damage to our country as is possible in what could be their last remaining months.

Of course, that's assuming we will have an election come May next year. Many of us still have doubts on whether this will take place or not. I believe it is no coincidence that the Met police are arming their officers with Heckler & Koch submachine guns for supposedly 'routine' patrols in gangland hotspots in central London. This is not what our police are there to do. Nor are they there to create databases of 'domestic extremists' under the instructions of the Association of Chief Police Officers, a private company with no mandate from the public whatsoever.

No, we are seeing the last desperate throes of democracy as we knew it in this once great country of ours. We are being spied upon, catalogued, assessed, and brow-beaten in the very real hope that by the time the shadows make their move, there will be no fight left in us. But they are wrong. The British people have a genetic hatred for dictators and their followers. To paraphrase the words of a very wise Narn;

"No dictator, no invader, can hold an imprisoned population by the force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against that power governments, and tyrants, and armies can not stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free."


Share/Save/Bookmark

ACPO Advises Breaking the Law

Wednesday, 16 September 2009

I have mentioned ACPO, the Association of Chief Police Officers, before. It is an organisation I believe should be disbanded, and its officers charged with corruption if there is a law general enough to cover their actions, exposed in the press otherwise.

ACPO is not a government body, a QUANGO or even a staff association or union. It is a company limited by guarantee, answerable only to its guarantors. I can only assume it is specifically permitted to leave out the term “Limited” in its name. This is usually required, and leaving it out masks the nature of ACPO.

Now ACPO is advising senior police officers to break the law and keep DNA samples despite a court ruling. Now I disapprove of the European Court of Human Rights. I also disapprove of large tracts of human rights legislation that conveys rights, having seen no case that these rights are inherent. However police of all people cannot just go around obeying only those laws they choose to obey.

Of course there are solid arguments against keeping DNA of innocent people on a database. Political argument (it is unpopular), theoretical science (a large database is arguably less useful) and experience (it has rarely if ever been used to solve serious crime) argue against keeping such a large database.

Anticipating that new legislation on DNA retention will come into force next year, a letter from ACPO states

“Until that time, the current retention policy on fingerprints and DNA remains unchanged.

Individuals who consider they fall within the ruling in the S and Marper case should await the full response to the ruling by the Government prior to seeking advice and/or action from the police service in order to address their personal issue on the matter.”

Why is an unaccountable body making policy? Why is it doing so in secret? On what authority does ACPO determine what any officer ‘should’ do? Why moreover is an independent body coercing the police to break a court judgement?

Cross posted from my blog.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Where's The Accountability?

Tuesday, 7 July 2009

In response to a report in today's Telegraph citing how Ian McPherson, chief constable of Norfolk Police, had his stamp duty paid as part of £70,000 sweetener to tempt him to the job, Stephen Bett, chairman of Norfolk Police Authority, responded by sayng, "We are looking for people who can think outside the box, do what we want to be done, be accountable and provide the people of Norfolk with the best possible police force."

Now, putting aside the uber-bollocks* that is 'thinking outside the box' (a term I resolutely detest in much the same way I detest those that deploy it), can anyone tell me how Mr McPherson is in anyway accountable to the people of Norfolk? They didn't vote him in, nor can they vote him out. Residents cannot dictate what police priorities should be in their local area, nor can they have any say in the remuneration that is paid out to chief constables employed by their local force. Where's the accountability? Damned if I can see it.

It is now becoming clear that the upper echelons of the police force in the UK is slowly becoming a law unto itself, and the rising power of unaccountable organisations such as ACPO and APA has to be questioned directly. I was never too sure that the proposal from Tories such as Douglas Carswell, Daniel Hannan and Mark Reckless for locally elected 'sheriffs' would work in reality, but I am now starting to change my mind.

NB - The following FOI and response regarding Ian McPherson is worth a look

*Bollocks is not a swear word
Share/Save/Bookmark