Musings of a Eurosceptic

Saturday, 31 October 2009




What's it called when someone apparently sabotages their own plans?  Calling it 'electoral suicide' might be too strong and 'shooting oneself in the foot' doesn't quite do it justice.  How about 'beating the electorate over the head with conflicting propositions and then sitting back and blaming everyone else when you can't do what you said you would do but you knew that would be the case all along'?

I think that just about sums up Cameron's position on the EU but perhaps 'sabotage' isn't the word, perhaps it's been the art of politicking from the outset.

politic adj 1 said of a course of action: prudent; wise; shrewd. 2 said of a person: cunning; crafty. 3 old use political. See also body politic. verb (also politick) (politicked, politicking) intrans, derog to indulge in politics, especially to strike political bargains or to gain votes for oneself.

After looking at all the evidence M'Lud I conclude that Mr 'same destination; different path' Cameron has always wanted Britain to be in the EU. Ted Heath begged our way into it (I wish he were alive today.  Still, come the revolution we can always dig him up and hang his bones on a gibbet in Parliament Square), Thatcher discovered what it was all about and stood her ground as best she could, John 'Maastricht' Major didn't.

The Trades Unions wanted to join the EU because they saw the EU as giving them more power -  they imagined an EU-wide strike of, eg, postal workers.  I bet they'll be amongst the first on the bonfire of vanities.

The Labour Party, composed as it is of Fabians, ex-Marxists, ex-Trots, and advocates of Common Purpose & Agenda21, have always been sneaky International Socialist backdoor-dogs.  Some are useful idiots and the majority, Miliband, Brown, Balls, Straw et al, will find they are expendable.

Back to Cameron:  In less than twelve months we have gone from this, which was a holding position, to this, when his prevarications were noted by the msm, and this, which we knew would be the outcome.   In fairness, he has always said, "If the Lisbon Treaty has not been ratified by all 27 countries by the time there is a Conservative government, we will hold a referendum."  When pushed, the line has always been, "We will not let matters rest there."

There was never any way on God's earth that the Lisbon Treaty would not be fully ratified by all twenty-seven countries if/when the Conservatives formed a government next May and Cameron knew it, even as he wrote to Vaclav Klaus asking him to delay the Czech signing (nice try, Dave).

We can expect sudden and major changes in our Constitution to become self-evident - things done behind closed doors will come out into the open and why not?  After all, in the words of EU Leaders, this Treaty is the final treaty and the EU won't need another: it is self-amending.  Cameron's promise to put further treaties to the British people is hollow and he knows it.  He must know it because even I know it.  I think I'm right in saying that after Lisbon there's only one way to go back and that's to repeal the the 1972 European Communities Act.

That's the Party I'll vote for - the one that gives the British people a voice because I'm heartily sick of this damned stuff - look below at the Post of the Week from CharonQC or if you're feeling more poetic, read Philip Pullman's powerful statement on the state of our country.

What will it take?  When will GK Chesterton's Silent People speak?

Cross-posted
Share/Save/Bookmark

Happy Halloween

Friday, 30 October 2009



Happy Halloween.

Starring:

Alistair Darling as Dr Frankenstein
Gordon Brown as Frankenstein's Monster
Bob 'Wiggy' Ainsworth as The WigWolf
Harriet Harman as a bloodless Ghoul
and Peter Mandelson as Count Dracula Prince of Darkness

From The Red Rag



Share/Save/Bookmark

Watford Parents Only Have Themselves To Blame!

Thursday, 29 October 2009

'Prove You're Not A Paedo' screams the headline in The Sun today, a brutal yet concise summing up of the absurd situation that has been allowed to develop in Watford as the council seeks to ban parents from their adventure playgrounds on the grounds that they cannot be trusted with their own children.

This state of affairs would be laughable if it wasn't so malignant. The very fabric of our society is being ripped apart under a sustained assault on our right to live our lives as we see fit with as little state intrusion as possible. The plain fact of the matter is the state does not agree with us, it wants our compliance and our control. To be good citizens we must adhere to the rules and laws that the state sets out for us. Common sense is gone, burnt on the same funeral pyre that is consuming our civil liberties and right to privacy.

I can't help wondering though how many of those parents complaining this morning voted Labour or Lib Dem at the last election, national or local? For all their complaining, I am sad to say that those parents in Watford who voted for either of the two leftist parties are just as culpable for this travesty as Dorothy Thornhill (pictured), the Lib Dem Mayor of Watford who has defended the decision, and the council officials who decided to push this through. Those parents only have themselves to blame. Unfortunately, I have a sad feeling that many of them will not learn their lesson. And before they know it, it will be too late.

And it certainly blows a hole in any claims the Lib Dems may make about being the party of 'civil liberties'. If this is what it's like to live under a Lib Dem controlled council as Watford is, imagine the damage they'd do if put in charge of the country. Labour and the Lib Dems, two cheeks of the same arse!
Share/Save/Bookmark

Stand Firm Vaclav Klaus!

Tuesday, 27 October 2009

SIGN THE PETITION HERE

I'm writing to ask urge to sign a crucial petition that the TPA is running. As you may know, there is now only one man standing between the Lisbon Treaty (formerly known as the EU constitution) and ratification: President Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic. President Klaus has come under huge pressure from the EU and other European leaders to sign the Treaty, but so far he has held out in the face of all the threats and incentives that have been offered to him.

Every single main party promised us a referendum at the last General Election, but we have been denied it. We are running a petition to send a message of support to President Klaus, and to urge him to hold out until we get that vote that we were promised. By contrast to our own leaders, who have betrayed their promise, he is sticking his neck out for our democracy as well as his own, so the least we can do is to express our thanks and express our support for him to continue his valiant action.

Please do sign the petition here and forward this message on to all of your friends and family - the more people who sign, the better our chance of getting that referendum.

Thank you for your support,

Matthew Elliott
Chief Executive
The TaxPayers' Alliance

Share/Save/Bookmark

Climate Change Treaty: Glenn Beck interviews Lord Monckton

On 19th October 2009, just ahead of the US government signing the UN's Climate Change Treaty, Glenn Beck interviewed Lord Monckton who is visiting America in an effort to stop the treaty in its tracks.

As Monckton eloquently explains, the treaty is designed to herald in World Communism, lately touted as World Government, on the back of the global warming scam.

Every nation that signs it will thereby cede its sovereignty to the UN while wealth passes from the 'rich' nations to the 'developing' nations.

One assumes that one of the developing nations feeling hard done by is China, given that it thinks we've had an unfair head start on it.  Never mind that without the West's technical know-how, bestowed upon it by the US and Europe, it would still be in the dark ages.

(Two- part autoplay):



Hat tip: Banned

Cross-posted
Share/Save/Bookmark

The Coming Of Shadows

Mrs Elvis is not particularly interested in politics, and who could blame her? She has me to live with after all.

But a very peculiar thing happened in the Paisley household last evening. Whilst watching the enthralling Murderland, we were, once again, subjected to the overly political scaremongering advert for Act On CO2. You know the one, where the puppy drowns? Yes, that one.

Now I've occasionally spoken out on these things much to Mrs Elvis's bemusement, who is the sort of person that tries to see the good in everyone. Her nature is such that if her own worst enemy came begging at the door, she wouldn't turn them away, but would offer them any and all assistance she could. She is the original good samaritan.

So it came as a great surprise to me last night that Mrs Elvis turned to me in disgust after the advert had reached it's conclusion and commented that there is something deeply wrong in our country and the way we are being brow-beaten by the forces that be. The penny is finally starting to drop. And if Mrs Elvis is now becoming aware of the coming darkness, then there is no doubt in my mind that we really are in trouble.

You only have to look at today's Telegraph to get an idea of just how bad things are going to get if we continue on our current path. We have the ISA expanding on it's original mission statement to sow real seeds of doubt and mistrust in the minds of anyone who has not been 'vetted' to see if they're safe to work with children. And Lord Stern is calling on people to eat less meat to help with climate con change. In the Mail we find that there has been a large increase in the number of middle-aged people being criminalised for petty offences, whilst in the same paper we read of a leading Labout think-tank who airbrushed links between immigration and crime in a PIU report issued in 2001. I could go on...

On top of that we have the Lisbon Treaty and the probable ascendency of Tony Blair to the role of EU President. Need I say more?

With each remaining day of this morally bankrupt and treacherous government, we fall further and further into the darkness. It has now become increasingly clear that the 'agents of change' amongst us have ramped up their operations to do as much damage to our country as is possible in what could be their last remaining months.

Of course, that's assuming we will have an election come May next year. Many of us still have doubts on whether this will take place or not. I believe it is no coincidence that the Met police are arming their officers with Heckler & Koch submachine guns for supposedly 'routine' patrols in gangland hotspots in central London. This is not what our police are there to do. Nor are they there to create databases of 'domestic extremists' under the instructions of the Association of Chief Police Officers, a private company with no mandate from the public whatsoever.

No, we are seeing the last desperate throes of democracy as we knew it in this once great country of ours. We are being spied upon, catalogued, assessed, and brow-beaten in the very real hope that by the time the shadows make their move, there will be no fight left in us. But they are wrong. The British people have a genetic hatred for dictators and their followers. To paraphrase the words of a very wise Narn;

"No dictator, no invader, can hold an imprisoned population by the force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against that power governments, and tyrants, and armies can not stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free."


Share/Save/Bookmark

Free Speech Go To Hell

Monday, 26 October 2009




Yet another EU Directive:

[The Equal Treatment Directive] is common hate crime legislation, which will turn disapproval for Islamic practices or homosexual lifestyles into crimes. Europe’s Christian churches are trying to stop the plan of the European political establishment, but it is unclear whether they will be successful. The media are silent on the topic.




The directive applies to social protection and health care, social benefits, education and access to goods and services, including housing. American citizens and companies doing business in Europe are also required to adhere to it.  The directive’s definition of discriminatory harassment is so broad that every objection to Muslim or homosexual practices will be considered unlawful.





We Brits are such an offensive lot aren't we and the peace-loving minority must be protected from our 'propensity to violence & aggression'?  TM Jack Straw.  'We must be mad, truly mad.' TM Enoch Powell.

Is their really any point in all this?  I seem to remember a saying about a wise General knowing when to withdraw from the battle.
Share/Save/Bookmark

A SMARTER way to fight Climate Change - video.

Saturday, 24 October 2009

If you believe in man made climate change or not, you must watch the following four videos. All governmental leaders around the world should sit down, pin their ears back, and listen to some real common sense from Bjorn Lomborg. Please take the time to watch these videos, it will take you about 35 minutes, and you will learn a great deal about how we could deal with climate change in a smarter and cheaper way.








Share/Save/Bookmark

Nick Griffin's Question Time remix - the video.

Friday, 23 October 2009


Share/Save/Bookmark

The Love Police On Duty

I have just watched these over on The Libertarian Alliance (yes, I am aware it is Friday night, I am going to the off licence imminently!) 

Definately worth a watch.




Share/Save/Bookmark

Sleep Education Should Be On National Curriculum. No, Really.

Children "need sleep education".

"Around two-thirds of people in Leeds (62%) and Sheffield (66%) believe that sleep should be part of the National Curriculum."

I despair sometimes, I really do.
Share/Save/Bookmark

37 Days Later

After coming back from the recess on the 16th October following the longest summer break ever (82 days), the formal State Opening of Parliament will be on the 18th November.

Harriet Harman has announced the earliest Christmas recess ever of three weeks from 16th December to 5th January 2010.  At 128 days, the current Parliamentary session is the shortest for 30 years.

And we pay them how much?

Our intrepid reporter managed to smuggle out this photo of Gordon Brown in the kitchen of No.10, busying himself with Christmas preparations:




PS Just a reminder of how much we really need 646 'representatives' in Westminster:


Share/Save/Bookmark

Please Welcome Steve Green To The Resistance

We're very proud to announce that Steve Green of the Daily Referendum blog has joined Voice of the Resistance. Please join me in welcoming Steve to the Resistance.


Share/Save/Bookmark

No10 Petition: Stop Puppy drowning Climate Change ad.



Over the past week the Advertising Standards Authority has received 375 complaints about the campaign.

There is also No10 Petition (657 signatures and rising) to get this Government propaganda pulled:

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Stop wasting taxpayers' money on climate change propaganda designed to frighten our children.

The government's latest TV advertisement on climate change is pure propaganda designed to frighten our children. Showing kids a puppy drowning in the centre of what looks like a British town is beyond fiction. It shows a weakness of argument for a government to have to resort to fear to bring the public "in line". This advertisement should be pulled immediately.


In the current economic climate, surely the government can find something better to spend six million pounds of taxpayers' money on.


Click HERE to sign the petition.


Share/Save/Bookmark

Only 36% of Americans Believe man is causing climate change.

From the Huffington Post:

WASHINGTON — The number of Americans who believe there is solid evidence the Earth is warming because of pollution is at its lowest point in three years, according to a survey released Thursday.

The poll of 1,500 adults by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found that only 57 percent believe there is strong scientific evidence the Earth has gotten hotter over the past few decades, and as a result, people are viewing the situation as less serious. That's down from 77 percent in 2006, and 71 percent in April 2008.

But while the evidence appears clear, only about a third, or 36 percent of the poll respondents feel that human activities – such as pollution from power plants, factories and automobiles – are behind a temperature increase. That's the first decline since 2006.

Share/Save/Bookmark

BNP On Question Time

Thursday, 22 October 2009

I am a supporter of Freedom of Speech, and I happen to think that it is essential to a free society that people be allowed to express themselves freely.  With curbs at law allowing compensation for such things as slander, on the whole we, in principle at least, have a reasonable and decent set up.  Yes, the walls have been closing in quite a bit in the last few years, but I think this has been broadly acknowledged, and as soon as this particular Government is ousted I believe on this issue under the Conservatives we can return to a normal debate and square some of those issues away.

As Newton pointed out, every action has an equal and opposite reaction.  Though this is a law of physics, it can sometimes be applied to situations in our lives.  To allow for Freedom of Speech there is a cost or in this analogy opposite reaction, which is that we don't just then hear what we want to hear.  We have to allow for the fact that people are going to have opinions vastly different to yours and mine and that those opinions may well cause offence.

The equal reaction is that The BNP, and in this case Nick Griffin is also subject to this and he will have to hear what those of us who do not support the BNP have to say.  I think it is right that the BNP have their say, as much as I disagree with them it is the price of free speech and one I am glad to pay.  And on this score the BBC are right to have allowed Mr Griffin onto their flagship politics show.

If you cannot allow for this, even broadly, then I do not think you can really be a advocate for free speech.

I hope that the fellow panel members take the full opportunity to debate Griffin on TV.  Over one million people voted BNP at the EU elections, and I wonder how many of them have actually heard Nick Griffin speak on TV or Radio?  I would wager not that many; certainly a low percentage considering he is a party political leader.  The concerns expressed by those who do not want the BNP on TV are that he will be "recruiting" - as if National Socialism and Racism were some unstoppable irresistible force that must not be allowed into people's ears.  I just do not understand this rationale.  Informed debate and giving people ALL of the facts is what is needed, and the mainstream political parties need to get better at doing that, even if it means we learn more about them than they don't like.  Let people hear what he has to say, it may turn out that instead of recruiting new people those that did vote BNP may now not do so again in the future.

I know Jack Straw and Chris Huhne are due to appear, and they will need to up their game for this.  I am not sure who the other two panellists will be*, I hope someone from the conservatives and someone from the centre-right press.  Question Time does tend to swing four lefties to one centre-right panellist many weeks, so tonight may well be no different on that score.

I happen to think that if the panel spend an hour screeming "raaaacist!" in Nick Griffins direction, they will themselves not come off too well.  In my opinion, they should try to draw out some opinions and policies that go beyond what will have been rehearsed off screen prior to an apperance, and then look for an opportunity to explain how poor those policies and opinions are, and how they would adversly affect the country and the people that live here if widely implemented.

I also just want to say that despite my absence from the B-BBC live blog in recent weeks (due to the unseemly time I have to get up these days, QT is on when I am usually in bed) and though I will be annoying the wife, I am going to make the extra effort to be there tonight so we can deliver our own collectively unique commentary on events.  I would urge others who would like to join to be there early, as the unmoderated slots will go quickly.

Cross-posted

* Baroness Warsi and Germaine Greer are the other guests.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Mind The Language

Wednesday, 21 October 2009

I'm beside myself.  Taxed, fined, penalised, threatened - and all with our own money.  Why do we let them get away with it?  WHY?
Massive expansion of the Big Brother state is planned.  The £200million-a-year sum will give officials access to details of every internet click made by every citizen - on top of the email and telephone records already available.
Here's the latest cattle prod up the taxpayers' collective backside:
A Home Office spokesman said the costs involved were entirely separate from those necessary to comply with the European Data Retention Directive, which requires the storage of phone and email records.
Comfuckingpletely ripping us off
Enfuckingtirely wrong
Unconfuckingditionally authoritarian
Comprefuckinghensively undemocratic

European Data Retention Directive 32006L0024 Directive 2006/24/EC
Intercept Modernisation Programme
EU DRD condemned
Share/Save/Bookmark

Whoever You Want, As Long As It's A Woman

Tuesday, 20 October 2009

How David Cameron has the bare-faced cheek to say he wants to restore trust in politics and localise democracy yet in the same breath say the Conservatives will have all-women shortlists is really trying my patience with the Party.

This morning during the Speaker's Conference (which, btw, Brown appears to have bottled in its original format),  he described under-representation of women and ethnic minorities as “a real problem - a real problem for parliament and for my party”.  His answer is for CCHQ to choose 'suitable' candidates to put before voters, possibly in open primaries.  Suddenly, we're back in black, one-legged lesbian territory again.  Cameron can't pay lip service to people power by adopting the Fabians favourite tactic of smiling to your face but then stabbing you in the back.

This is from  ConHome:
This quote is typical from ConHome feedback from Associations involved in using them:
"We have to have the same number of women on the shortlist even if three or four times as many men apply. To be one of the shortlisted men you have to be very special. To be one of the shortlisted women you do not. Every Association suspects that the members of gender-balanced shortlists are not of equal talent."
and this:


It seems to me that Carswell (Open source politics means hands off) and Hannan  (How to make Parliament representative) are rowing upstream.

Also:  Cameron is told  not to abuse powers of patronage and Carswell has tabled an EDM: Parliamentary Elections (Recall & Primaries) Bill which at the moment appears to have only one signature - his own.  He asks that readers of his blog urge their MPs to sign up.
Share/Save/Bookmark

EDM 2090 - Parliamentary Elections (Recall And Primaries) Bill

Please write to, email, twitter or generally harass your MP in the most appropriate form to sign up to this EDM from Doug Carswell MP.

PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS (RECALL AND PRIMARIES) BILL



19.10.2009

Carswell, Douglas

That this House is deeply concerned about the lack of public engagement in political and democratic affairs and the cynicism and distrust of the political system felt by many voters; notes that the recent Power Inquiry found that this is all too often borne out of a sense of disempowerment; believes that new measures are required to enable voters to participate more fully in the political system; welcomes the provisions of the Parliamentary Elections (Recall and Primaries) Bill tabled by a cross-party group of hon. Members that would permit voters to recall their hon. Member in certain specified circumstances and also require a returning officer to hold primary elections if requested to do so by any local political party with the support of at least 1,000 voters; further notes that the leaders of the three largest political parties have expressed support for the need for new initiatives to engage the public; and hopes that this Bill will become law expeditiously, believing that it will help restore faith in the political process.

Cross-posted appeal
Share/Save/Bookmark

From The Resistance This Week

Fausty asks, are we being groomed for Communism?

John Ward says Peter Hain (aka The Cuprinol Kid) has attacked the BBC for letting the BNP onto Question Time.

Ollie Cromwell snatches Frank Fields halo by highlighting some piggy behaviour.

Calling England takes us on a a mental stroll to Runnymede.

North Northwester talks science and scientists in a piece called Professor Zombie.

Jess The Dog says the people are rising up against the idea of President Blair of Europe.


Viva la resistance!
Share/Save/Bookmark

Stop President Blair - Petition

Sunday, 18 October 2009


38,000 people have signed a petition opposing Blair as EU president.

We, European citizens of all origins and of all political persuasions, wish to express our total opposition to the nomination of Tony Blair to the Presidency of the European Council.


View the signatures and comments here.

Stop Blair website here.

(cross-post from my blog)

Share/Save/Bookmark

Children To Be Given Lessons in 'The EU'

Thursday, 15 October 2009

If you ever wondered why the Conservatives where right to leave the EPP as they did, then look no further than the latest proclamation from Portuguese MEP Mario David who is calling on national governments to indoctrinate children into being good EU citizens by way of compulsory classes in the workings and history of the EU.

I don't know where to start with this one, but it is growingly increasingly obvious that the EU is fast becoming the Fourth Reich and is now running on largely the same principles, albeit using stealth as it's facilitator.

I remember writing some time ago that we should take it upon ourselves to 'teach our children well', and now I feel stronger than ever that this is right strategy to take. As Nigel Farage himself admits in the linked article, as sickening as this idea is to those of us who can see the EU for what it really is, it is more than likely that Mario David's will be passed. Well, it's a no-brainer really.

Hitler once said, "When an opponent declares, "I will not come over to your side," I calmly say, "Your child belongs to us already. . . . What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community."

Now is the time to start laying down the foundations of the resistance to come. The coming war for our national identities will not be fought on the streets or on the battlefield. It will be fought in the classrooms, in our newspapers and on our TV screens, and we have to start preparing.

The idea that the EU will be allowed into our children's classrooms is abhorrent and should be resisted. Will you join the fight?
Share/Save/Bookmark

MP Troughers hope to get off lightly

Voice of the Resistance cites examples of trivial sums paid back to the public purse (I presume) by seriously troughing MPs - many of which might well be guilty of theft or fraud and other common criminal offences.

As well they might.

In my view, Labour, borne of spin, is its own worst enemy. Doubtless, its MPs were wooed by Labour into MPship with riches beyond the reach of the plebs they once were.

These piddling sums the troughers are currently being required to pay back indicate many things, two of which are:

* the simple cases are coming to light first, because they are easier to investigate; the more serious cases will follow;

* the cabinet troughers and/or those with the highest profiles are hoping to fob off the public with trifling 'integrity'- or 'pragmatic'-based payouts, hoping that we will be too bored to bother should the 'media interest' go on for too long;

The latter suggests to me that the powers that be are well aware that some of the most high-profile troughers are guilty of theft or fraud.

By the end of November, should none of the biggest culprits (Jackboot and McNulty, for example) be prosecuted, or at LEAST made to pay back their ill-gotten gains, the thirst for Labour blood will be mighty indeed.

Let the Tories be in no doubt that they will not be spared, should they put party interests before country.

Cross-posted
Share/Save/Bookmark

PMQs

Wednesday, 14 October 2009

It's a given that I lost my sense of humour about this govt a few years ago and all that's left to me is honesty and ridicule.

I had the misfortune to catch the end of 'Scotland Questions' in which Jim Murphy and Danny Alexander answered questions:

Lindsay Roy MP, Glenrothes: By how much will the bottom grant for Scotland increase in 2010/11.

Jim Murphy, Sec of State for Scotland:

"The Scottish government [sic] will have more money next year than it has this. It's a remarkable benefit of the economics of the United Kingdom and the fact is, Mr Speaker, the Scottish govt, the SNP Scottish Government, today, has doubled the budget that Donald Dewar had when he was First Minister. However Mr Speaker, the SNP Scottish Govt is going to have to tighten its belt and make some savings like every other family and company is doing in Scotland."

That put me in a bad mood even before I'd started on PMQs. The Scottish Executive is just that - it isn't a govt in its own right and the present govt of the United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland shouldn't give the impression that it is.

Gordon Brown, 'World Statesman of the Year', opened PMQs with a tribute to the dead in Afghanistan and a commitment to those still alive. He named all those killed in Afghanistan in the time Parliament had been in recess (82 days). It took him two minutes & a bag-load of hypocrisy  to list thirty-seven names & Regiments.

Anne Winterton (Con, Congleton) had the first question which was about the Lisbon Treaty.
AW: "Mr Speaker, when the Lisbon Treaty comes in to force, the European Council will become a formal institution of the European Union. As the UK member of that institution will the PM confirm that he is bound by its rules and is thus obliged to further the objectives of the EU in preference to those of the UK?"

PM: "As far as the EU is concerned, we joined the EU in the 1970's and we hold by our obligations to the EU but that doesn't prevent us representing the national sovereignty of this country."

It wasn't a European Union when we voted on it, it was a friendly community of trading partners & Brown has changed language, changed history by calling it the EU in 1972. Nothing was mentioned about the Lisbon Treaty over-riding the Communities Act we had a referendum on in 1972.

I really can't be bothered any more - questions asked are questions asked too late or not answered at all.

Some notes:
Tony Wright has a dig at Gen Sir Richard Dannatt
Cameron - TA - lack of training yet still parachuted into Afghanistan*
serried ranks primped and primed
leap across despatch box and slap him soundly with a wet fish
green power
Bercow - they got what they voted for
elfyn llwyd plaid leader how many ex-services are in prison
let's face it, he's still the toerag who wrote about blagging your way into parties by putting 2 bricks in the bottom of a carrier bag and a few empty cans on top.

Brown's statement on Afghanistan
AFLS = absofuckinglutely stupid
Extra troops on one hand and £20m on the other - taliban weapons
Cameron - helicopters, not training the TA
Flashman Blair Brown
Charge of the Light Brigade
House less than a third full
wheat -v- opium
Fat chance

Sir Peter Tapsell: Can I put it to the PM that anyone who thinks that a NATO-trained Afghan Army recruited from six to seven mutually hostile tribes is going to defeat the Taliban is living in a political cloud cuckoo land.

Brown's response: Effing rubbish.

My response: Do the right thing and call a GE now. Where's our Monarch in all this? Dissolve Parliament and call a GE.  What happened to the people?  Where did we go?
Share/Save/Bookmark

Geert Wilders Is Coming!

Controversial Dutch MP Geert Wilders has won his appeal against exclusion from entry into the UK, reports The Independent.

The decision was made by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal, with which I have some familiarity with an earlier incarnation when it was the Immigration Appeals Tribunal (actually, there were two of them) during my years working in the Immigration and Nationality Dept of the Home Office.

This is another triumph for the cause of free speech — the second today (i.e. following the "de-gagging" of The Guardian over the reporting of a parliamentary question).

Whether one likes Wilders's views, or appreciates his film Fitna (about Islam), he should have the right to express his views as long as they do not try to incite violence or similar. I haven't encountered any evidence that anything he has said or done could sensibly be categorised in such a way, so in my mind there were no valid grounds for his exclusion from this country in the first place.

Attempts by the Labour Government and their allies to portray Wilders as "an extremist" never held any water, and said far more about his detractors than they ever could about him. This has now effectively been demonstrated. Cranmer puts it well, as he usually does.

Mr Wilders now intends to visit this country as soon as he can.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Appeal For Support To Audit The US Federal Reserve

Monday, 12 October 2009

Did you know that the Federal Reserve is not a part of the US Federal Government?

Did you know that it is in fact a Private Company?

Did you know that The US Government has little domestic oversight of the US Fed?

Did you know that the US Fed can enter into negotiations with “Foreign” central banks without Federal oversight?

Did you know that the Federal Reserve has never been audited?

The US Government does not own and it does not control the US Fed. Yet the Fed controls the monetary policy of the biggest economy on the planet and has a direct line to the US Treasury Department. The Fed board’s influence extends to and beyond the US Government and as such the Fed has a very big say in the economic health of the Western World. It is in fact the single most powerful organisation influencing world markets. But where are the checks and balances? There are none.

Ron Paul, everybody’s favourite Republican (outside of the US) introduced House Resolution Bill 1207 The Federal Reserve Transparancy Act to the US House of Representatives in February this year urging the Federal Government to bring the Fed under real scrutiny starting with a full public audit of the bank, to be completed before the end of 2010. This is earth shattering stuff, seeing as nobody is even sure who owns the Fed.

Here is the speech Ron Paul gave when he introduced the bill.


Madame Speaker,


I rise to introduce the Federal Reserve Transparency Act. Throughout its nearly 100-year history, the Federal Reserve has presided over the near-complete destruction of the United States dollar. Since 1913 the dollar has lost over 95% of its purchasing power, aided and abetted by the Federal Reserve’s loose monetary policy. How long will we as a Congress stand idly by while hard-working Americans see their savings eaten away by inflation? Only big-spending politicians and politically favored bankers benefit from inflation.


Serious discussion of proposals to oversee the Federal Reserve is long overdue. I have been a longtime proponent of more effective oversight and auditing of the Fed, but I was far from the first Congressman to advocate these types of proposals. Esteemed former members of the Banking Committee such as Chairmen Wright Patman and Henry B. Gonzales were outspoken critics of the Fed and its lack of transparency.


Since its inception, the Federal Reserve has always operated in the shadows, without sufficient scrutiny or oversight of its operations. While the conventional excuse is that this is intended to reduce the Fed’s susceptibility to political pressures, the reality is that the Fed acts as a foil for the government. Whenever you question the Fed about the strength of the dollar, they will refer you to the Treasury, and vice versa. The Federal Reserve has, on the one hand, many of the privileges of government agencies, while retaining benefits of private organizations, such as being insulated from Freedom of Information Act requests.


The Federal Reserve can enter into agreements with foreign central banks and foreign governments, and the GAO is prohibited from auditing or even seeing these agreements. Why should a government-established agency, whose police force has federal law enforcement powers, and whose notes have legal tender status in this country, be allowed to enter into agreements with foreign powers and foreign banking institutions with no oversight? Particularly when hundreds of billions of dollars of currency swaps have been announced and implemented, the Fed’s negotiations with the European Central Bank, the Bank of International Settlements, and other institutions should face increased scrutiny, most especially because of their significant effect on foreign policy. If the State Department were able to do this, it would be characterized as a rogue agency and brought to heel, and if a private individual did this he might face prosecution under the Logan Act, yet the Fed avoids both fates.


More importantly, the Fed’s funding facilities and its agreements with the Treasury should be reviewed. The Treasury’s supplementary financing accounts that fund Fed facilities allow the Treasury to funnel money to Wall Street without GAO or Congressional oversight. Additional funding facilities, such as the Primary Dealer Credit Facility and the Term Securities Lending Facility, allow the Fed to keep financial asset prices artificially inflated and subsidize poorly performing financial firms.


The Federal Reserve Transparency Act would eliminate restrictions on GAO audits of the Federal Reserve and open Fed operations to enhanced scrutiny. We hear officials constantly lauding the benefits of transparency and especially bemoaning the opacity of the Fed, its monetary policy, and its funding facilities. By opening all Fed operations to a GAO audit and calling for such an audit to be completed by the end of 2010, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act would achieve much-needed transparency of the Federal Reserve. I urge my colleagues to support this bill.

The Bill is gaining momentum and people in the US are taking notice and an interest and there are some public campaigns aimed at applying pressure on US Congressmen and Senators to back this Bill.

It is important because the US Fed makes decisions that affect us all, it is directing traffic and nobody is really sure how strong or weak it really is. If Ron Pauls bid succeeds, other central banks would come under pressure to also come under open scrutiny.

So, if you are a reader from the US, please lend your support to 1207 and urge your representatives to do the same. If you are in the UK please sign THIS PETITION on the 10 Downing Street website urging our Prime Minister to publically lend his support to the existing calls for the US Fed to be audited. Please advertise the link on your blogs and social networks and let’s see if we can help Ron Paul and the US Congress open the books on the Fed. Maybe then we can really get a handle on the Global Economic downturn.

This video is of Ron Paul explaining why this is an important bill. He explains it much better than I can.





Cross-Posted
Share/Save/Bookmark

Swine flu: lawsuit filed to halt distribution of vaccine

Friday, 9 October 2009

Given that the swine flu vaccine has not been adequately tested, Tim Turner, a health freedom lawyer, is suing Washington DC today in order to halt the vaccine's distribution in America. This issue is particularly contentious because Massachusetts aims to make vaccinations manadatory, on pain of incarceration for those that refuse.

Natural News reports:
On behalf of plaintiffs Dr. Gary Null and other licensed health care workers of New York State, the lawsuit charges that the FDA violated the law in its hasty approval of four swine flu vaccines by failing to scientifically determine neither the safety nor efficacy of the vaccines.
Listen to Tim Turner talk to Natural News about protecting yourself from swine flu and the inadequacy of the vaccine's testing:





The article continues:
"The FDA is required by law to establish that a vaccine is safe and effective before it can be given to the public," said Turner. "We are arguing that they did not establish that the vaccine was effective, and did not establish that it was safe. They are trying to get it on the market by a waiver."
The article is well worth reading - read it in full.

Cross-posted

Share/Save/Bookmark

Czechs Holding The Line?

Thursday, 8 October 2009

Just heard that Vaclav Klaus is set to delay full ratification of the Lisbon Treaty by asking that a 'footnote' be added to the document, a move that will give further hope that the Czech Republic might, just might hold up the procedure long enough to see a Referendum in the UK if, as expected, the Conservatives are elected next May.

I don't have any further info, but this may be a ray of light following Ireland's yes vote last week. Here's hoping.

UPDATE - I wonder if the Speccy are readers of VOTR?


Share/Save/Bookmark

Quote Of The Day

Tuesday, 6 October 2009

"Let’s be honest: five more years of Brown is about as attractive a proposition as a handjob from Edward Scissorhands."

Morris Dancer, of PoliticalBetting.com
Share/Save/Bookmark

Was There Fraud In The Referendum Count?

Monday, 5 October 2009

I am not sure if there was fraud, but Scunnert has put up these videos that may cast a doubt over the controls in place.






As the Tap Blog has already covered, but the police were very keen to ensure that monitors not be allowed to count the number of people turning up to vote.  So what checks were in place to ensure this would be a fair vote?

It smells a little fishy.

Cross-Posted as it deserves a big audience.
Share/Save/Bookmark

Quibbling With Cameron

Sunday, 4 October 2009

It's just a small point but it's stuck in my head. This morning on the Andrew Marr programme:
Marr: ...once it's ratified, what then? And I put it to you that you're not answering because you don't know what to do.
Cameron: ...a very good reason... I don't want to say anything or do anything now that will undermine or prejudice what is happening in other countries where they're still debating whether to ratify this treaty...sensible thing to do... as I said, I don't want to undermine or prejudice those people elsewhere in Europe who are currently debating...
Marr: (interrupting) I don't understand this.
I don't understand it either. If Lisbon can be debated in Germany, Ireland, Czech Republic & Poland at the same time (as it was), where's the harm if Britain debates it as well?  It's a spurious and lame excuse if ever I heard one. DC needs to up his game.

What he said is a far cry from: "I will give this cast-iron guarantee: If I become PM a Conservative government will hold a referendum on any EU treaty that emerges from these negotiations."

Much more was said about 'Europe' so I'll post the video if it turns up on YouTube.
UPDATE:  Here is a short extract:

Cross-posted from Calling England
Share/Save/Bookmark

My kind of gloat...

Saturday, 3 October 2009


Now this could only happen to a guy like me
And only happen in a town like this
So may I say to each of you most gratefully
As I throw each one of you a kiss

This is my kind of town, Chicago is
My kind of town, Chicago is
My kind of people too
People who smile at you

And each time I roam, Chicago is
Calling me home, Chicago is
Why I just brim like a cload
Its my kind of town

My kind of town, Chicago is
My kind of town, Chicago is
My kind of razzmatazz
And it has, all that jazz

And each time I leave, Chicago is
Tuggin my sleeve, Chicago is
The Wrigley building, Chicago is
The union stockyard, Chicago is
One town that wont let you down
Its my kind of town


Let's hear it for the greatest orator and maker of friends America has ever seen.


Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha


Share/Save/Bookmark

'President Blair' - How To Stop Him


We have 4 weeks or so until the earliest opportunity to install a EU President, possibly Tony Blair. Political Betting reports that he is 6/4 favourite.

This is unthinkable. Blair is completely discredited in the UK because of his legacy of spin and the lies and deceit surrounding the disastrous Iraq War. In fact, the only reason Labour were elected in 2005 was his promise to stand down and the false hope that Gordon Brown could somehow do a better job.
I feel revolted and viscerally angry at the prospect of an unelected 'President Blair', anger I have not felt since the Hutton Inquiry (whitewash) and my decision to resign my Royal Air Force commission.
Time to fight back! It is possible that the treaty could be fully ratified and a president appointed after the next month. We have 4 weeks to save ourselves from the prospect of a President Blair!
So, how to fight back? Expressing our opinions to the UK government is a waste of time. They promised a referendum at the time of the last election, then broke that promise. Labour view the democratic process as an inconvenience and will be delighted if they can foist Blair upon us as a 'scorched earth' legacy to remain after their eviction from office. The Tories can do little, as they may well take office after the treaty is fully ratified. It is also debatable whether Cameron wants to fight on this issue (given the history of Euro-politics within the Tories) although William Hague's intervention in the Times today is extremely welcome. We need to express our opposition to Blair to the UK government, but that will be just letting off steam and will do nothing except for put our defiance on the record. We need another approach.
We need to lobby Europe. My Euro-politics are middle-of-the-road: I recognise the EU as a good thing but believe it is bloated and over-intrusive. Many of us will be anti-EU, possibly a few of us pro-EU. But it is no good simply writing off letters in English full of the usual arguments.
Our lobbying must be focussed and effective.
  • 1. Target the audience. There are 2 main audiences. Firstly, the national newspapers. The French have Le Monde, the Germans have Die Zeit, the Suddeutsche Zeitung and the Frankfurt-Allgemeine Zeitung; in Spain it is El Pais and El Mundo. Secondly, national leaders. Most of us know them - Angela Merkel, Nicholas Sarkozy etc. But we need a definitive list, of both newspapers and leaders, particularly from the newer EU members.
  • 2. Frame the argument. The argument needs to be clear and EU-neutral. We need to accept broadly the position of the Lisbon Treaty even if we disagree with it (or the lack of a referendum). The argument needs to focus on a few critical issues why Blair should not be a EU President, from the UK's perspective:
  • - Blair's discredited status and the fact he left office when in government
  • - Blair's role in the lies and deceit of the Iraq War, and the suspicions of supporting CIA torture.
  • - The discredited nature of the UK Brown government that is seeking to foist Blair upon us.
  • - Particular anger in the UK when the British people have had no say in either the treaty or the candidate.
  • - The real risk that specific anti-Blair anger could alienate the British people from Europe in a manner not seen before, possibly leading to pressure to break away from the EU.
  • This argument needs to be drafted and translated into the languages of the nations it is being sent to. We need help to do this. I can knock out a basic German letter but it would be inelegant and far from colloquial. This is very important. It shows respect, effort and credibility. The letters need to be in French, German, Spanish, Italian at least as well as languages of the newer members (Czech Republic).
  • 3. Get the argument out there. We need to use the internet to mobilise opposition. Supporters of this campaign need to be able to download translated letters, add their own details, email them to the targets from a pre-prepared list.
The aim of this campaign is to get UK anti-Blair anger on the front pages of European national newspapers, and to register this anger with other EU leaders That is the only avenue we have open to us.
We need to mobilise our own resources.
We need:
  • A draft letter in English. (I can undertake to do this)
  • Volunteers to translate the letter into colloquial French, German, Spanish, Italian and as many other EU languages as possible. (I can probably arrange Spanish translation and have an attempt at German translation)
  • Volunteers to compile a list of email addresses for European newspapers and the offices of European leaders.
  • A dedicated website or blog to host the letters, instructions and email addresses. This blog is an excellent start, ideally such a blog will be multi-user.
  • Other bloggers and the MSM to 'spread the word'
We can stop Blair. We must stop Blair.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Hope Not Dope

Friday, 2 October 2009

Here's a good slogan (and window poster) for the General Election, thanks to Curly


Share/Save/Bookmark

An Open Letter To The People Of Ireland

Thursday, 1 October 2009

I wish there were some magic words or some great prose I could muster or recite but we are all sick and tired of the arguments and fear mongering, you will certainly be even more so than me. You, the good people of Ireland voted right the first time, it is such a shame that decision could not be respected. You voted right because you voted how you felt and in good conscience.

Yes, I am clearly in favour of a NO vote tomorrow, and though the polls say I am in for a grand disappointment I have not lost faith that Ireland will vote NO again. I am not going to list all the reasons why I think this, again, except this one reason. Tomorrow you vote on exactly the same Constitutional Treaty that you have already rejected. Not one sentence, word or comma will have changed. This is almost certainly the very last treaty Ireland can vote for as this one hands all the marbles to the likes of Barroso and Blair, and they can do what they like after this one and Ireland will be in the same boat as all the rest of us – with no say at all.

If your concerns are immigration then a YES vote takes more control from The Oireachtas and Irish courts and hand it over to Brussels, you have seen in the last year the EU already can VETO your own courts. If your concerns are religious and perhaps even about abortion, then Bruno brings news from the Vatican that you may wish to read. If it is economic then I would say that as you (Ireland) are America’s truest best friend in the World there is no way they would see economic damage done to you, and also that your successes have been from decisions on tax and employment taken much closer to home and that should be protected, not handed away.

It must not be very nice being dictated to from Europe in one ear, and pleaded to from English, Scottish and Welsh voices in the other. I would say I do not envy your position, but I do, I wish I had the opportunity to vote on this so I could register my opinion and exercise my democratic will. But I don’t and I can’t. You might not like that the hopes of so many hinge on your votes tomorrow but they do. The biggest problem with the EU is that the bigger and more powerful it gets, the smaller the pool of decision makers becomes. We the people in our respective countries on the street and in the pub become less and less influential and have less say the more and more our national governments and the EU take powers away from us.  There is an ocean of millions of people who's opinions and decisions are ignored, we look to you, again, tomorrow.

So, please, do what is right and proper and vote with your conscience and exercise that precious right that you have; and that you have secured for yourselves by protecting your rights in your Constitution. If you truly believe that Lisbon is right for Ireland and for Europe then you should vote YES. [But I, not so secretly hope your cars breakdown, chains fall of bikes and that a torrential rain follows you every time you step outside.]

For those of you who are looking to vote NO, please do so, and for all the same and right reasons. Please also remember to make sure all of your friends and family who are voting the same way make it to polling. [To you I hope your cars are in excellent working order, and that the sun shines and the birds sing for you all day.]

For those of you who are undecided, please, please keep reading and listening to all the papers to the TV, to your friends and families. It does matter which way you vote, but it is always better to have elections decided by the biggest possible turnout. If you do not, you may look back and regret not being involved and having your say when you had the chance to, and tomorrow is that chance.

Now, back to being partial.

Ireland, please vote NO!
Share/Save/Bookmark

This Is What A Yes Vote Brings With It Ireland

Vote YES and you will get Tony.

















































































Cross-Posted
Share/Save/Bookmark

New Franco-German Axis

Hot on the heels of Tuesday's news that the Lisbon Treaty will be implemented no matter what the outcome of the Irish referendum comes the news that France & Germany have agreed a secret accord. The drive is towards a two-tier EU and there's the possibility of a reciprocal placing of Ministers in their Cabinets (imagine a German or French Minister sitting in Brown's Cabinet!)

Joschka Fischer, a former German Foreign Minister, said the Franco-German axis  had to come into its own again whatever the fate of the Lisbon treaty: “The centre of gravity of Europe can only be Paris and Berlin.”

Sarkozy withdrew his backing for Blair as President of the EU some months ago but it now seems to be official.  The front-runners being considered are Felipe González, the former Socialist Prime Minister of Spain, and Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg.
“Tony Blair is a man of the past and the United Kingdom is no longer any model,” said a French diplomat.
It's disingenuous of them to pretend that there are no EU Ambassadors or EU Embassies in place already.  Many of the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty are already in existence, being undertaken covertly so that once the treaty is formally ratified the project can be unleashed.

Ah, les Anglo-Saxons!  Constantly screwing up the German-France axis since 1939.  De Gaulle should have stuck to his principles and not allowed himself to be sweet-talked by Heath's entreaties.

The only correct British response should be: "Cry havoc!  And let slip the dogs of war.   Do your worst."



UPDATE: I forgot to link this: Jose Manuel Barroso has warned that there will be no EU Commissioner for the Czechs unless they ratify Lisbon. Any nation with an ounce of self-respect would tell the EU what to do with its threats, and I include Britain in that.  It's a disgrace that we have to look to Ireland, the Czech Republic, & Poland instead of having our own Referendum.
Cross-posted from Calling England
Share/Save/Bookmark